History
  • No items yet
midpage
Henry v. Commonwealth
3 Watts 384
| Pa. | 1834
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The act of 1814, which extends the benefit of the insolvent laws to criminals in confinement for costs, contains no provision for intermediate liberty, whether the applicant be under sentence or in execution. That measure was introduced by the act of 1820, which relates by its terms but to debtors in execution, though the case of prisoners under sentence must have met the eye of the legislature, as it was embraced by the preceding legislation. Under these circumstances, and particularly as the legislature might well see reason to distinguish between those who are criminal and those who are but unfortunate, to be silent about it was to except it. The bond, then, being unauthorized by statute, cannot support an action.

Judgment reversed, and judgment rendered here for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Henry v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 15, 1834
Citation: 3 Watts 384
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.