History
  • No items yet
midpage
Henderson v. Maclay
3 Sadler 40
| Pa. | 1886
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam :

These two cases were argued together. The main facts are common to both. The cases were tried before the judge, without a jury, under the act of April 22, 1871.

We are clearly of opinion that the learned judge gave a correct construction to the trust deed. Any other would be doing violence to the plain import of its language.

Mrs. Jane E. Henderson paid for the é acres and 109 perches of land, and owned it. The possession of her husband after her death was as tenant by the curtesy only. The possession after-w ards taken and held by Maclay saved the trust under the statute.

Judgment in each case affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Henderson v. Maclay
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 4, 1886
Citation: 3 Sadler 40
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.