History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Radcliff
331 Pa. Super. 537
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 1984
|
Check Treatment

Judgment of sentence vacated and case remanded for evidentiary hearing to determine whether defendant waived her Rule 1100 rights, and if so, whether counsel was ineffective in consenting to such waiver. If the lower court finds such waiver invalid or counsel ineffective in consenting thereto, then defendant is to be discharged; otherwise a new trial is to be granted for reasons other than the Rule 1100 violation.

WICKERSHAM, J., filed a dissenting memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Radcliff
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 6, 1984
Citation: 331 Pa. Super. 537
Docket Number: Nos. 222 and 296
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.