History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nixon v. Myers
21 A. 670
Pa.
1891
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam:

We do not find any error in the charge of the learned judge below. The plaintiff brought his suit for breach of contract. Under the circumstances, he was not entitled to recover the special wages for the year, but merely damages for the breach. We think the measure of damages, as defined by the court, was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Nixon v. Myers
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 13, 1891
Citation: 21 A. 670
Docket Number: No. 166
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.