History
  • No items yet
midpage
Glenda Brunk v. Conseco Bank, Inc.
21-1891
| 8th Cir. | Feb 15, 2022
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges

____________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri resident Glenda Brunk appeals following the district court’s [1] adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se action raising claims under Missouri state law and the Truth in Lending Act. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Additionally, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brunk’s motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933, 935 (8th Cir. 2006) (abuse of discretion review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

[1] The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri -2-

Case Details

Case Name: Glenda Brunk v. Conseco Bank, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 15, 2022
Docket Number: 21-1891
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.