History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norton v. Fello
23 Misc. 2d 924
| N.Y. App. Term. | 1960
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The theory of the action, as pleaded, was breach of warranty. The determination made below was based solely upon negligence. A new trial is required since the issues presented in the breach of warranty action were not considered or passed upon.

*925The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to defendants to abide the event.

Concur — Hart, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Norton v. Fello
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Jan 29, 1960
Citation: 23 Misc. 2d 924
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.