The action is upon an undertaking executed by the defendants.
The answer denies all the allegations of the complaint except that the defendants had executed a certain undertaking of the general description and character referred to in the complaint.
The defense relied upon a counterclaim.
But it appeared by the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiffs that the same matters pleaded had been adjudicated adversely to the defendants’ assignors in a litigation to which they were privies, and they were, therefore, precluded thereby.
Under these circumstances the, trial judge properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and as there are no errors requiring a new trial, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Newbubgeb, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
