History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tobin v. Cary
41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 431
| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1885
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The only question submitted in this case is whether the court had power to allow the amendment by an acknowledgment nwno pro tuno of the consent of a guardian to his appointment as such. We are of opinion that under section 723 of the Code of Civil Procedure that that power exists, and that the order of the court, as duly executed by the amendment of the record by inserting the acknowledgment, removed all objections to its validity.

There should be judgment in favor of Tobin requiring the purchasers Cary & Roth to perfect their purchase. By the stipulation in the case no costs are to be awarded.

Present — Davis, P. J., Beady and- DaNiels, JJ.

Judgment ordered for plaintiff on case submitted, without costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Tobin v. Cary
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1885
Citation: 41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 431
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.