History
  • No items yet
midpage
Willingham v. Goord
296 A.D.2d 792
N.Y. App. Div.
2002
Check Treatment

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt was presented at his disciplinary hearing in the form of the misbehavior report, the positive urinalysis test results, and the testimony given by the correction officer who conducted the urinalysis tests and authored the misbehavior report (see, Mat*793ter of Schnittker v Selsky, 288 AD2d 794; Matter of Mason v Goord, 251 AD2d 829). Petitioner’s unsupported contentions that the urinalysis test results were invalid and that procedural errors denied him a fair hearing have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Willingham v. Goord
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 25, 2002
Citation: 296 A.D.2d 792
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.