—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered on or about June 19, 2001, which, in an action to rescind a limited partnership agreement and to restore plaintiff’s title to the building
To the extent that the order on appeal suggests that the building be included with the assets to be divided equally among the partners, it contravenes a prior order and judgment of another Justice, affirmed by this Court, awarding plaintiff full title to the building (227 AD2d 192, lv dismissed 89 NY2d 860), which shall be delivered forthwith by quitclaim deed. To the extent that the order directs the manner of distribution of partnership assets other than title to the building, it is premature, as the very purpose of the hearing on plaintiff’s objections to defendant’s accounting, previously ordered by this Court but yet to be conducted, is to assist the court “in ultimately determining the rights and liabilities of the parties” (267 AD2d 123). We have considered and rejected plaintiff’s other arguments, as well as defendants’ argument that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that plaintiff was not aggrieved. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andidas, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
