History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sedita v. Verdi
2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2002
|
Check Treatment

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to the Dram Shop Act, the defendant Caffe Baci appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme *666Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated May 14, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sedita v. Verdi
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 22, 2002
Citation: 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.