History
  • No items yet
midpage
Amy Corp. v. Wendt
277 A.D.2d 1088
N.Y. App. Div.
1950
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The cause of action alleged in the answer against the defendant-appellant is erroneously labeled as a counterclaim. However, it does not state an affirmative cause of action against the defendant-appellant which should not be stricken on motion. When the facts are developed at the trial, if the plaintiff is successful, the court may then determine whether or not defendants-respondents are entitled to the relief asked for against the defendant-appellant. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying a motion to strike out part of an answer which asked affirmative relief against a codefendant.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Amy Corp. v. Wendt
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 1, 1950
Citation: 277 A.D.2d 1088
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.