History
  • No items yet
midpage
Breland v. Long Island Railroad
275 A.D.2d 945
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1949
|
Check Treatment

We agree that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. However, the proof adduced in support of plaintiff’s version of the accident was not incredible as a matter of law. The dispute as to how the accident occurred was one involving the credibility of the witnesses; and, under the circumstances disclosed by this record, it was error to direct a verdict for defendant. (Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 N. Y. 241; Ruthizer v. Bass Dress Corp., 264 App. Div. 372.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Breland v. Long Island Railroad
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 13, 1949
Citation: 275 A.D.2d 945
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.