History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garland v. Garland
275 A.D.2d 847
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1949
|
Check Treatment

Under the circumstances here shown, counsel fee should not have been allowed. (Beadleston v. Beadleston, 103 N. Y. 402, 404; McCarthy v. McCarthy, 137 N. Y. 500; Fishman v. Fishman, 275 App. Div. 777.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Garland v. Garland
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 16, 1949
Citation: 275 A.D.2d 847
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.