History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garland v. Garland
275 A.D.2d 847
N.Y. App. Div.
1949
Check Treatment

Under the circumstances here shown, counsel fee should not have been allowed. (Beadleston v. Beadleston, 103 N. Y. 402, 404; McCarthy v. McCarthy, 137 N. Y. 500; Fishman v. Fishman, 275 App. Div. 777.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Garland v. Garland
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 16, 1949
Citation: 275 A.D.2d 847
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.