History
  • No items yet
midpage
Braitman v. Minicucci & Grenga
272 A.D.2d 875
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2000
|
Check Treatment

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ submissions in opposition to the motion raise triable issues of fact whether defendants are entitled to any part of the retainer fee paid by plaintiff Brown and East Ridge Partners to defendant Minicucci & Grenga. We therefore modify the order and judgment in appeal No. 1 by denying plaintiffs’ motion. In light of our determination, the appeal by defendants from the order in appeal No. 2 denying their motion seeking leave to renew plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is dismissed as moot (see, 55 Liberty St. Assocs. v Garrick-Aúg Assocs. Store Leasing, 255 AD2d 188). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Stander, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Braitman v. Minicucci & Grenga
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 10, 2000
Citation: 272 A.D.2d 875
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.