History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weinreb v. Access Northern-Security Control, Inc.
2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2000
|
Check Treatment

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Access Northern Security Control, Inc., a/k/a Access Control International appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Kramer, J.), dated August 12, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained in a slip and fall accident, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either created the dangerous condition, or had actual or constructive notice thereof (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836). We agree with the Supreme Court that, after the appellant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiff came forward with sufficient admissible evidence in opposition to the motion to create an issue of fact as to whether the appellant created the alleged dangerous condition. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Weinreb v. Access Northern-Security Control, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 22, 2000
Citation: 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.