History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Cahill
261 A.D.2d 972
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1999
|
Check Treatment

—Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating that there is “reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate motion may then be made. The relief requested in the motion before us now is premature (see, People v Mateo, 239 AD2d 965; see generally, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342). Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Cahill
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 7, 1999
Citation: 261 A.D.2d 972
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.