Hopwah v. Hopwah
678 N.Y.S.2d 893
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1998|
Check TreatmentOrder of disposition, Fam
Family Court’s inquiry respecting respondent’s mid-trial application to proceed pro se was a proper exercise of discretion given respondent’s failure to advise the court more clearly of his wish to represent himself (see, People v Rheubottom, 131 AD2d 790).
We have considered respondent’s remaining contention and find that it is unavailing. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Rubin and Williams, JJ.
