History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greenberg v. Parbury
251 A.D.2d 454
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1998
|
Check Treatment

—In two related actions to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated July 16, 1997, which denied their motion, among other things, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in both actions.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*455This action arose from a motor vehicle accident involving a vehicle owned by Ellen J. Greenberg and Stephen R. Green-berg, the plaintiffs in Action No. 1, and a vehicle owned by the appellant Aaron Todd Boat Shipping, Inc., and operated by the appellant Philip E. Parbury, who are the defendants in both actions. The appellants’ claim that the plaintiffs are required to exhaust collateral resources, such as insurance, before prosecuting an action against the appellants, is without merit. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion, inter alia, for summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, .49 NY2d 557, 562). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Greenberg v. Parbury
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1998
Citation: 251 A.D.2d 454
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.