Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed.
The defendant did not preserve for appellate review his contention that the People failed to prove his identity as the perpetrator beyond a reasonable doubt, as he did not raise this contention at trial (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Cabey, 85 NY2d 417, 421; People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925, 926), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
