History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hausman v. Stern
653 N.Y.S.2d 8
N.Y. App. Div.
1997
Check Treatment

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered May 30, 1996, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against defendant-appellant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s assertion that he thought his answer would be served along with his mother’s, without explaining exactly what led him to this belief or submitting an affidavit from his mother explaining her involvement with his answer, is insufficient to excuse his default in appearance. Nor does appellant set forth a meritorious defense in asserting that plaintiff consented to the payments made on his behalf from the trust by his successor trustee, without submitting any supporting affidavits or documentation from those who might have knowledge of such consent. No genuine issues are raised as to the propriety of service. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Tom, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Hausman v. Stern
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 28, 1997
Citation: 653 N.Y.S.2d 8
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.