History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Ass'n & Buffalo Board of Education
643 N.Y.S.2d 251
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1996
|
Check Treatment

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition denied, cross motion granted and award vacated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition, which sought an order confirming the arbitrator’s award. The arbitrator sustained petitioner’s grievance and determined that respondent violated the collective bargaining agreement by failing to appoint the highest scoring unit member on the eligible list to the position of associate account clerk. We reverse. An employer "may not surrender its ultimate appointing authority” in a collective bargaining agreement (Matter of Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, 129; see, Civil Service Law § 61). The agreement improperly restricts respondent’s discretionary authority by requiring respondent to appoint the highest scoring unit member and, thus, the arbitrator erred in enforcing it. Because the arbitrator’s award is in violation of public policy, it must be vacated. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Arbitration.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Ass'n & Buffalo Board of Education
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 31, 1996
Citation: 643 N.Y.S.2d 251
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.