History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gillard-Holmes v. Persigo
225 A.D.2d 519
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1996
|
Check Treatment

The plaintiffs’ appeal taken as of right from the order dated November 9, 1994, is dismissed since no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536). In addition, the order is not appealable as of right as it determined a motion that was not made on notice (see, CPLR 5701 [b]).

The appeal from the order dated December 14, 1994, is also dismissed. The order dated November 9, 1994, dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint "without prejudice”. The plaintiffs subsequently commenced other actions arising out of the same facts and seeking the same relief in the Supreme Court, Nassau County. Thus, the appeal from the order dated December 14, 1994, is dismissed as academic. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Gillard-Holmes v. Persigo
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 4, 1996
Citation: 225 A.D.2d 519
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.