History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Purtell
639 N.Y.2d 814
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1996
|
Check Treatment

While a defendant must be sentenced "without unreasonable delay” (CPL 380.30 [1]), delay caused by a defendant’s conduct is excusable (People v Drake, 61 NY2d 359, 366). Defendant first absconded in 1989, after pleading guilty to grand larceny. Thereafter, he was arrested and convicted of various crimes in several different States, and he repeatedly jumped bail that was set on New York fugitive warrants, after using aliases and false pedigrees. Although the 41/2 year period of delay in imposing sentence is considerable, it was entirely attributable to defendant’s conduct, and accordingly, the delay was not unreasonable. Defendant’s sentence was not excessive in light of his extensive criminal record. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Purtell
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 28, 1996
Citation: 639 N.Y.2d 814
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.