Concurrent sentences were required because the two convictions were based on the same act (see Penal Law § 70.25 [2]). Defendant’s act of punching the victim in the face while he was on top of her was the force necessary to subdue her in furtherance of the attempted rape (see e.g. People v Carmona, 205 AD2d 443 [1st Dept 1994], lv denied 84 NY2d 866 [1994]; People v Bolden, 83 AD2d 921 [1st Dept 1981], affd 58 NY2d 741 [1982]).
