History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Parsons
1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13362
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1994
|
Check Treatment

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the argument that Supreme Court should have allowed defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty. Where the court imposes conditions on its sentencing commitment and defendant violates those conditions, the court is no longer bound by its commitment and may impose a greater sentence without offering defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea (see, People v Forgue, 179 AD2d 1060, lv denied 79 NY2d 1000; People v Shannon, 175 AD2d 614, 614-615, lv denied 79 NY2d *902832; People v Brooks, 154 AD2d 931). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Wesley, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Parsons
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 23, 1994
Citation: 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13362
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.