History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Sharawy
198 A.D.2d 516
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1993
|
Check Treatment

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Harbater, J.), rendered January 8, 1992, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree and forgery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Sharawy
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 29, 1993
Citation: 198 A.D.2d 516
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.