History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dublin v. Prime
1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16020
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1990
|
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Prime appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated June 19, 1989, as granted the cross motion of the defendant McNeilab, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the appeal must be dismissed because the appellant is not aggrieved by the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint against his codefendant, McNeilab, Inc. (see, CPLR 5511; Hauser v North Rockland Cent. School Dist. No. 1, 166 AD2d 553). Eiber, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Dublin v. Prime
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 24, 1990
Citation: 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16020
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.