History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Houston
158 A.D.2d 971
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1990
|
Check Treatment

Moreover, counsel’s failure to make a pretrial motion to suppress the evidence cannot be said to have deprived defendant of the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v White, supra, at 860). Defendant failed to demonstrate "the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel’s failure to request a particular hearing” (People v Rivera, supra, at 709).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se brief, and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — criminal possession of controlled *972substance, third degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Houston
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 2, 1990
Citation: 158 A.D.2d 971
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.