History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Batista
952 N.Y.S.2d 903
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2012
|
Check Treatment

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered December 9, 2009, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are without merit. Rivera, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Batista
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 7, 2012
Citation: 952 N.Y.S.2d 903
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.