History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Henriquez
116 A.D.2d 589
N.Y. App. Div.
1986
Check Treatment

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), *590rendered February 18, 1982, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Linakis, J.), of that part of defendant’s motion which sought suppression of physical evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and do not find that the arresting officer’s testimony was either incredible as a matter of law or patently tailored to avoid constitutional objections (see, People v Berrios, 28 NY2d 361; People v Brown, 107 AD2d 754; People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86). Accordingly, the People have sustained their burden of going forward in the first instance and showing the legality of the police conduct. Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Henriquez
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 13, 1986
Citation: 116 A.D.2d 589
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.