History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Chambliss
1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48603
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1985
|
Check Treatment

Based upon the record at bar, we find that defendant’s statement to the police the morning after his arrest was made after he knowingly and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. There was no evidence that the delay between defendant’s arrest and his arraignment was unwarranted. Moreover, such factor is but one of several bearing upon the question of voluntariness of an inculpatory statement (People v Dairsaw, 46 NY2d 739, cert denied 440 US 985). Further, the court gave a lengthy and thorough instruction to the jury regarding this issue (cf. People v Lovello, 1 NY2d 436; People v Vann, 54 AD2d 356).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them also to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Chambliss
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 8, 1985
Citation: 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48603
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.