History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burnham v. Brenna
86 A.D.3d 537
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2011
|
Check Treatment

*538The father moved to dismiss the mother’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 to renew her prior motion and for an award of an attorney’s fee. The Family Court properly denied the father’s motion, because a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 may be directed only against a cause of action or a defense, not a motion (see CPLR 3211 [a], [b]). Here, the proper response to the mother’s motion would have been to submit opposition papers (see CPLR 2214 [b]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Burnham v. Brenna
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 5, 2011
Citation: 86 A.D.3d 537
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.