History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Smith
82 A.D.3d 911
N.Y. App. Div.
2011
Check Treatment

The defendant’s claim regarding an alleged promise that, upon pleading guilty, he would be committed to a correctional facility within a particular geographic area, involves an issue that is dehors the record and, thus, not reviewable on direct appeal (see People v Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772, 773-774 [1983]; Matter of Benjamin S., 55 NY2d 116, 120-121 [1982]; People v Da Forno, 53 NY2d 1006, 1008 [1981]; People v Chrysler, 288 AD2d 318, 319 [2001]; People v Branch, 288 AD2d 55, 55-56 [2001]; People v Finch, 279 AD2d 588 [2001]; People v St. Gelais, 245 AD2d 318, 319 [1997]; People v Watford, 239 AD2d 367, 367-368 [1997]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Smith
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 8, 2011
Citation: 82 A.D.3d 911
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.