History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Murga
358 N.Y.S.2d 1014
N.Y. App. Div.
1974
Check Treatment

Decision affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Staley, Jr., J. P., Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Cooke, J., dissents and votes to remit in the following memorandum: Cooke, J. (dissenting). I' dissent and vote to remit the matter to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings. In view of the medical proof in the record from two doctors that claimant’s husband was advised to move to a warm climate, that. Puerto Rican climate was favorable after the operation and that home care was needed until three months after the operation, the board’s finding to the contrary was, as a matter of law, unsupported by substantial evidence.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Murga
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 3, 1974
Citation: 358 N.Y.S.2d 1014
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.