Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered June 8, 2009, which denied plaintiff 853’s motion to modify a prior order declaring that the impact of the rent stabilization and rent control laws should not be considered in appraising land defendant W & HM leased to 853, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order (same court and Justice), entered June 11, 2009, which, in a related special proceeding, granted W & HM’s petition to confirm an appraisal award, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order (same court, Justice and entry date), which denied 853’s cross petition to vacate that award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
This Court has previously rejected 853’s claim that in determining the value of—and, in turn, the rent for—property it leases from W & HM, the appraisers should consider the
We have considered 853’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
