Rosana R. v. James M.
68 A.D.3d 544
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2009|
Check TreatmentWe have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.