History
  • No items yet
midpage
Intercontinental Planning v. Daystrom, Inc.
1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3294
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1963
|
Check Treatment

Orders, entered on December 14, 1962 and February 4, 1963, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Resettled order entered on April 25, 1963, denying defendant Schlumberger N. V. (Schlumberger, Limited) time to make motions addressed to the complaint and directing defendants to produce their officers and employees before a Special Referee to give testimony, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of limiting the scope of the examination to whether Schlumberger was the agent of Daystrom for the purpose of service of process, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The resettled order as entered was too broad. Concur —■ Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Intercontinental Planning v. Daystrom, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 11, 1963
Citation: 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3294
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.