History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wiesner v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc.
1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1963
|
Check Treatment

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury allegedly sustained when plaintiff was thrown from a vibrating machine in a gymnasium on the premises of the defendant Vic Tanny Queens, Inc., said defendant and the defendants Vie Tanny Gyms, Inc., and Vic Tanny, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 7, 1962, which denied the motion made by them and one other defendant for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see Grande v. Torello, 12 A D 2d 937; Krohn v. Steinlauf, 11 A D 2d 695, 696). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wiesner v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 7, 1963
Citation: 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5032
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.