History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smithson v. Tolbert
48 A.D.3d 471
N.Y. App. Div.
2008
Check Treatment

Proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Bruce E. Tolbert, a Justice of the Supreme .Court, Westchester County, to enter a judgment of divorce in favor of the petitioner in an action entitled Smithson v Smithson, pending under Westchester County index No. 15317/05.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary, remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Florio and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smithson v. Tolbert
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 5, 2008
Citation: 48 A.D.3d 471
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.