History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cantwell v. Lane
1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9744
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1962
|
Check Treatment

Motions by respondents made in separate proceedings pursuant to section 132 of the Civil Practice Act to vacate two orders granted ex parte by Special Term directing them to show cause why subpranas duces tecum issued by the Temporary State Commission of Investigation of the State of New York should not be quashed and staying the operative effect of the process until the determination of the motions. The order dated April 25 contained the additional pervasive provision which restrained “any action” by the commission “in regard to the records of purchases of the County ” for the same period. Motion in the proceeding instituted by petitioner Cantwell is denied, without costs. Motion in the proceeding instituted by petitioner Rice is granted to the extent of striking the provisions of the third decretal paragraph of the order granted therein and otherwise denied, without costs. If the motions have not been rendered academic by a decision of Special Term before the adjourned date of this term, June 12, 1962, they may be renewed by respondents, if so advised, on that date wihout oral argument on the papers now before us. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Cantwell v. Lane
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1962
Citation: 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9744
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.