History
  • No items yet
midpage
Solomon v. City of New York
226 N.Y.S.2d 679
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1962
|
Check Treatment

Such affirmance, however, is without prejudice, if the respective parties be so advised: (a) to a prompt motion at Special Term for leave to add Giaquinto as a party defendant, to serve a supplemental summons upon it, and to serve an amended complaint upon it and the defendant city; and (b) to a motion at Special Term to dismiss the action as against Giaquinto in the event that the motion first mentioned be not made within 30 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [21 Misc 2d 836.]

Case Details

Case Name: Solomon v. City of New York
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 5, 1962
Citation: 226 N.Y.S.2d 679
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.