History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stott v. Kevin
15 A.D.2d 827
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1962
|
Check Treatment

Defendants’ time to serve their answer is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. The complaint in substance alleges that plaintiffs are judgment creditors of defendant Melvyn Kevin; that the latter and his wife, defendant Judith Kevin, were owners as tenants by the entirety of the real property in question; that an execution issued on the judgment debtor’s personal property was returned unsatisfied; that thereafter both of said defendants (Melvyn and Judith Kevin) conveyed the real property to Judith Kevin; and that such conveyance was made without consideration, with intent to defraud the plaintiffs, and while defendant Melvyn Kevin was insolvent. We are in accord with the Special Term that under section 278 of the Debtor and Creditor Law the complaint is sufficient. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hopkins, JJ. concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Stott v. Kevin
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 26, 1962
Citation: 15 A.D.2d 827
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.