History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tripodi v. Wien
15 A.D.2d 744
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1962
|
Check Treatment

The action having been commenced in Nassau County, where none of the parties resided, the motion of the defendants for a change of venue to Bronx County, where defendants reside, should have been granted. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 182; Reed v. Ross, 260 App. Div. 596.) Although deemed moot by Special Term by reason of the order appealed from we note that plaintiff’s cross motion for a change of venue on the ground of the convenience of witnesses is unsupported by any factual statement in the affidavits submitted in support thereof, which were apparently prepared in support of a motion for a temporary injunction and have no bearing on the relief sought by way of cross motion. Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Tripodi v. Wien
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 6, 1962
Citation: 15 A.D.2d 744
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.