History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Wolochen
15 A.D.2d 538
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

The application was made on the ground that at the time of his appearance for arraignment before the Magistrate, the defendant refused the court’s offer to assign counsel and he was refused an adjournment to obtain counsel of his own choice. Under the circumstances here, whether or not defendant was represented by counsel at the preliminary hearing before the Magistrate, becomes immaterial since he was later represented by counsel *539on the trial (Canizio v. New York, 227 U. S. 82; People v. Langford, 156 N. Y. S. 2d 751, affd. 4 A D 2d 919). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Wolochen
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 18, 1961
Citation: 15 A.D.2d 538
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.