History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ficarra v. Sestak
222 N.Y.S.2d 515
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

*496Without reaching the question whether the expunged testimony and memorandum were or were not admissible in evidence, it is our opinion that the unusual circumstances of this ease require a new trial in the interests of justice. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur; Beldock, J., not voting.

Case Details

Case Name: Ficarra v. Sestak
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 4, 1961
Citation: 222 N.Y.S.2d 515
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.