History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sinclair v. State
43 A.D.3d 1144
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2007
|
Check Treatment

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Waldon, J.), dated August 17, 2006, which denied its motion to dismiss the claim as jurisdictionally defective and granted the claimant’s *1145cross motion for leave to amend the claim to add further specific allegations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In light of the recent amendment of Court of Claims Act § 11 (b) (L 2007, ch 606, § 1), retroactively abrogating Kolnacki v State of New York (8 NY3d 277 [2007]), the instant claim was not jurisdictionally defective notwithstanding the absence of an ad damnum clause.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit, or need not be addressed in light of our determination. Crane, J.E, Santucci, Florio, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sinclair v. State
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 25, 2007
Citation: 43 A.D.3d 1144
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.