History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Jalil
43 A.D.3d 804
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2007
|
Check Treatment

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered July 27, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his sufficiency claim and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim we would find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the juiy’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). There was extensive evidence, including defendant’s possession of a plastic bag matching a bag containing a computer in the process of being stolen, to establish that defendant entered the premises with intent to *805commit a crime. We perceive no basis to disturb the sentence. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Williams, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Jalil
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 27, 2007
Citation: 43 A.D.3d 804
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.