History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kane v. Jack & Betty Realty Corp.
14 A.D.2d 885
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

In our opinion, the evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case, and the jury’s verdict on the issues submitted may not be disturbed (cf. Robinson v. Church of St. Patrick’s, 269 App. Div. 752; Kane v. Ten Eyck Co., 19 Misc 2d 398, affd. 267 App. Div. 789, affd. 292 N. Y. 701; Jungjohann v. Hotel Buffalo, 5 A D 2d 496). No question of notice of any defect in the chair was presented to the jury for their consideration, and no request was made for instruction on that subject. The question is not in the case, except as presented by the motions to dismiss (cf. Reinzi v. Tilyou, 252 N. Y. 97, 199). It was for the jury to determine the amount of the damages. On consideration of all the proof, we are unable to say that their determination was disproportionate to the injuries which the plaintiff received. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Kane v. Jack & Betty Realty Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 6, 1961
Citation: 14 A.D.2d 885
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.