History
  • No items yet
midpage
Luciano v. Mapart, Inc.
14 A.D.2d 843
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

While under some circumstances a glass door exit may be constructed or maintained in a manner so as to constitute negligence (see Shannon v. Broadway & 41st St. Corp., 272 App. Div. 1029, affd. 298 N. Y. 589), in the instant case there was a complete absence of proof of negligence on the part of the defendant. There was no evidence offered to show faulty construction or improper maintenance. Consequently a direction of a verdict for the defendant was warranted (see Cooper v. Scharf, 11 A D 2d 101). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Steuer, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Luciano v. Mapart, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 9, 1961
Citation: 14 A.D.2d 843
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.